From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sholes v. Meagher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 2002
295 A.D.2d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-07598

Argued May 23, 2002.

June 25, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant Gerald Meagher and Furey Furey, P.C., and Christina Gulotta appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Catterson, J.), dated July 27, 2001, which, sua sponte, after granting a mistrial on December 14, 2000, based upon the prejudicial conduct of Christina Gulotta, attorney for the defendant Meagher, imposed costs and attorney's fees against Furey Furey, P.C., and Christina Gulotta pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1.

Furey Furey, P.C., Hempstead, N.Y. (James M. Furey, Sr., of counsel), nonparty-appellant pro se and for defendant-appellant and nonparty-appellant Christina Gulotta.

John L. Juliano, P.C., East Northport, N.Y., for respondents.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


ORDERED that the appeal by the defendant Gerald Meagher is dismissed as he is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal by the nonparty-appellants is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order is not appealable as of right because it does not decide a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701[a]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal.

FLORIO, J.P., SMITH, FRIEDMANN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sholes v. Meagher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 2002
295 A.D.2d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Sholes v. Meagher

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SHOLES, etc., et al., respondents, v. GERALD MEAGHER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 25, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
744 N.Y.S.2d 872

Citing Cases

Reyes v. Sequeira

After both sides submitted papers, the trial court ordered the attorney to pay her adversary approximately…