From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shipp v. Gaglia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 4, 1983
97 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

November 4, 1983

Appeal from the Erie County Family Court, Sedita, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Denman, O'Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: The denial of visitation to a noncustodial parent constitutes such a drastic measure that an order doing so should be based upon substantial evidence that the visitation is detrimental to the child's welfare ( Hotze v Hotze, 57 A.D.2d 85; see, also, Weiss v Weiss, 52 N.Y.2d 170, 175; Quinn v Quinn, 87 A.D.2d 643). On the record before us we agree that petitioner was properly denied unsupervised visitation, but we cannot determine whether the denial of supervised visitation was also warranted. There was no expert testimony as to the effect visitation would have on the child, no psychological examination of the father, no Law Guardian appointed to represent the child's best interests, nor any in camera interview of the child.


Summaries of

Shipp v. Gaglia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 4, 1983
97 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Shipp v. Gaglia

Case Details

Full title:JAMES P. SHIPP, Appellant, v. ANDREA GAGLIA, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1983

Citations

97 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Vasile v. Vasile

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Schnepp, JJ. Order unanimously modified, on the law, and,…

Meisner v. Meisner

Those allegations, if true, would be "`inimical to the welfare of the children'" ( Katz v. Katz, 97 A.D.2d…