From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shipman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 4, 2015
171 So. 3d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 1D14–3894.

2015-08-4

Dangelo H. SHIPMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County. Kevin A. Blazs, Judge. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Justin D. Chapman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County. Kevin A. Blazs, Judge.


Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Justin D. Chapman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, the State concedes that there is a double jeopardy violation which requires reversal for vacation of one of Appellant's convictions. The information charged Appellant with sexual battery on a person aged 12 years or older, and lewd or lascivious battery on a person aged 12 years or older but less than 16 years of age, and the record indicates the charges were based upon the same event. Appellant entered an open plea to the court without reservation of this issue, but because this double jeopardy violation constitutes fundamental error, it may be addressed for the first time in a direct appeal. See Binns v. State, 979 So.2d 439 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Tannihill v. State, 848 So.2d 442 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Hunt v. State, 769 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Appellant is therefore entitled to vacation of the sentence imposed for lewd or lascivious battery. See Hill v. State, 114 So.3d 1071 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

We therefore affirm the conviction for the sexual battery, but reverse the conviction for lewd or lascivious battery and remand with instructions that the trial court vacate this conviction.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., concur.




Summaries of

Shipman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 4, 2015
171 So. 3d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Shipman v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dangelo H. SHIPMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Aug 4, 2015

Citations

171 So. 3d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Richardson v. Florida

Despite Richardson's failure to raise this issue in the trial court, a double jeopardy violation is…

Johnson v. State

However, a double jeopardy violation constitutes fundamental error, which can be raised for the first time on…