From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shillingford v. Eckert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1979
73 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

December 3, 1979


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 18, 1979, which granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to serve and file an amended bill of particulars. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The amended bill of particulars does not seek to set forth new injuries, but merely expands upon "continuing * * * disabilities" alleged in the original bill of particulars. Thus, plaintiffs had a right to serve this amended bill of particulars (see CPLR 3043, subd [b]; L 1979, ch 590). Mollen, P.J., Titone, O'Connor, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shillingford v. Eckert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1979
73 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Shillingford v. Eckert

Case Details

Full title:SPENCER SHILLINGFORD et al., Respondents, v. ALBERT G. ECKERT et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 1979

Citations

73 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Olivo v. Nazario

As such, plaintiffs should have been permitted to serve their supplemental bill in Action No. 1."];…

Cardone v. University Hospital

The proposed supplemental bill of particulars does not set forth a new legal theory of liability or new…