From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shidlofsky v. Am. Honda Fin. Corp.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Nov 25, 2020
308 So. 3d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 4D20-441

11-25-2020

Jeff Robert SHIDLOFSKY, Appellant, v. AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

Lawrence R. Metsch of Metschlaw, P.A., Aventura, for appellant. Danielle N. Robinson of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


Lawrence R. Metsch of Metschlaw, P.A., Aventura, for appellant.

Danielle N. Robinson of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Gen. Matters, Inc. v. Paramount Canning Co. , 382 So. 2d 1262, 1264 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (interpreting similar provision of the uniform commercial code codified in Florida to require notice as a statutorily valid precondition).

Levine, C.J., Warner and Artau, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shidlofsky v. Am. Honda Fin. Corp.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Nov 25, 2020
308 So. 3d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Shidlofsky v. Am. Honda Fin. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JEFF ROBERT SHIDLOFSKY, Appellant, v. AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Nov 25, 2020

Citations

308 So. 3d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)