From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shetzen v. C. G. Aycock Realty Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 16, 1953
77 S.E.2d 554 (Ga. Ct. App. 1953)

Opinion

34769.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 16, 1953.

Appellate procedure. Before Judge Moore. Fulton Superior Court. May 25, 1953.

Joseph J. Fine, F. H. Boney, for plaintiff in error.

Sams, Wotton Sams, contra.


On two occasions the defendant filed exceptions pendente lite to the trial court's overruling of his general and special demurrers to the original petition and his general demurrers to the petition as finally amended. In a bill of exceptions assigning error solely upon these exceptions pendente lite, he now attempts to come to this court for a review. "While the losing party, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and this court, has the option of having reviewed a judgment on demurrer by a direct bill of exceptions or to have certified and filed exceptions pendente lite, if the latter course be pursued, the ruling on demurrer becomes a pendente lite ruling which is reviewable only after the termination of the case and in a bill of exceptions assigning error on the final judgment [citing numerous cases]." Cordele Sash, Door c. Co. v. Prudential Ins. Co., 84 Ga. App. 605 ( 66 S.E.2d 767). It follows that the writ of error in the instant case is prematurely brought to this court.

Writ of error dismissed. Gardner, P. J., and Townsend, J., concur.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 16, 1953.


Summaries of

Shetzen v. C. G. Aycock Realty Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 16, 1953
77 S.E.2d 554 (Ga. Ct. App. 1953)
Case details for

Shetzen v. C. G. Aycock Realty Company

Case Details

Full title:SHETZEN v. C. G. AYCOCK REALTY COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 16, 1953

Citations

77 S.E.2d 554 (Ga. Ct. App. 1953)
88 Ga. App. 710

Citing Cases

Averett v. McKenzie

[Numerous cases cited.]" Cordele Sash, Door c. Co. v. Prudential Ins. Co., 84 Ga. App. 605 ( 66 S.E.2d 767);…

State v. Killette

" ___ N.C. at ___, 814 S.E.2d at 43 (emphasis added). Nor do I agree with the majority's conclusion that…