From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sherman J. v. Betty J.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 28, 2017
156 A.D.3d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

5281

12-28-2017

In re SHERMAN J., Petitioner–Appellant, v. BETTY J., Respondent–Respondent.

Larry S. Bachner, New York, for appellant.


Larry S. Bachner, New York, for appellant.

Acosta, P.J., Richter, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gesmer, JJ.

Order, Family Court, New York County (J. Machelle Sweeting, J.), entered on or about May 1, 2017, which authorized petitioner to access his former residence on a specified date and time in order to retrieve personal belongings, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by petitioner's assigned counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 [1967] ; People v. Saunders, 52 A.D.2d 833, 384 N.Y.S.2d 161 [1st Dept. 1976] ). We have reviewed the record and agree with assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on this appeal. In fact, the Family Court's order provided petitioner with the exact relief that he was seeking.


Summaries of

Sherman J. v. Betty J.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 28, 2017
156 A.D.3d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Sherman J. v. Betty J.

Case Details

Full title:In re SHERMAN J., Petitioner–Appellant, v. BETTY J., Respondent–Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 28, 2017

Citations

156 A.D.3d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
156 A.D.3d 557

Citing Cases

Vanessa H. v. Michael T.

Moreover, petitioner is not an aggrieved party and lacks standing to appeal the dismissal with prejudice of…

Dale J.D. v. Randi N.H.

We agree with counsel that petitioner is not an aggrieved party and lacks standing to appeal the dismissal…