From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sheriff v. Jensen

Supreme Court of Nevada
Sep 24, 1979
95 Nev. 595 (Nev. 1979)

Summary

holding that a noncompliant petition is "neither cognizable below nor reviewable here"

Summary of this case from Yandell v. State

Opinion

No. 12139

September 24, 1979

Appeal from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael J. Wendell, Judge.

Richard H. Bryan, Attorney General, Carson City; Robert Miller, District Attorney, and Nikolas L. Mastrangelo, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Appellant.

Alan R. Johns, Las Vegas, for Respondent.


OPINION


The respondent, charged by complaint with embezzlement (NRS 205.300), failed to appear at his scheduled preliminary examination. The justice's court treated respondent's failure to appear as a waiver of his right to a preliminary examination, and based upon the affidavits attached to the complaint, the justice's court found probable cause to hold respondent to answer in the district court. Thereafter, appellant filed a pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court. The petition was granted by the district court, and from that order, this appeal has been perfected.

We are constrained to reverse the order of the district court without consideration of the merits. Respondent was arraigned in the district court on May 21, 1979. His pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus was not filed until June 21, 1979, a full 31 days after arraignment. Pretrial petitions for writs of habeas corpus are required to be filed within 21 days of the initial appearance of the accused in district court. NRS 34.375(1)(a). Our prior decisions have established that the first appearance in district court is arraignment. See Palmer v. Sheriff, 93 Nev. 648, 572 P.2d 218 (1977). Thus, the instant petition was not in compliance with the filing requirements of NRS 34.375(1)(a). The requirements of this statute are mandatory, and where, as here, the requirements are not complied with, the petition is neither cognizable below nor reviewable here. See Sheriff v. Toston, 93 Nev. 394, 566 P.2d 411 (1977). Accordingly, we reverse and remand the case to the district court with instructions to dismiss the petition.


Summaries of

Sheriff v. Jensen

Supreme Court of Nevada
Sep 24, 1979
95 Nev. 595 (Nev. 1979)

holding that a noncompliant petition is "neither cognizable below nor reviewable here"

Summary of this case from Yandell v. State
Case details for

Sheriff v. Jensen

Case Details

Full title:SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, APPELLANT, v. JACK JENSEN, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Sep 24, 1979

Citations

95 Nev. 595 (Nev. 1979)
600 P.2d 222

Citing Cases

Yandell v. State

We therefore lack jurisdiction to decide this issue—Yandell should have raised it in the district court in a…

Burns v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

This court's "prior decisions have established that the first appearance in district court is arraignment."…