From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sheridan v. Lemery Reid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 5, 1995
211 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

January 5, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Warren County (Dier, J.).


We affirm. Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in this legal malpractice action in directing plaintiff to serve a complete and sufficient bill of particulars since the responses in her original bill are so broad that they convey almost no information to defendants as to the nature of the claims plaintiff is asserting against them (see, Morris v. Fein, 177 A.D.2d 915, 916).

Mikoll, J.P., Crew III, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Sheridan v. Lemery Reid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 5, 1995
211 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Sheridan v. Lemery Reid

Case Details

Full title:JO ANN SHERIDAN, Appellant, v. LEMERY REID, P.C. et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 5, 1995

Citations

211 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
621 N.Y.S.2d 943

Citing Cases

Heyward v. Ellenville Community Hospital

We reach a different conclusion, however, with respect to demand No. 5. Plaintiff's answer to this demand,…