From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shepard v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 2, 1981
638 F.2d 909 (5th Cir. 1981)

Opinion

No. 76-4229.

March 2, 1981.

Robert E. Piper, Jr., Frank E. Brown, Jr., Shreveport, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Walter W. Christy, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; Ben C. Dawkins, Jr., J.

Before THORNBERRY, GEE and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING (Opinion May 14, 1980, 5 Cir., 1980, 617 F.2d 87).


In light of intervening decisions, including Satterwhite v. City of Greenville, 5th Cir. 1981, 634 F.2d 231, (En Banc Decision on Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States); Armour v. City of Anniston, 622 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1980) (On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States), the case is remanded to the district court to determine whether there exists a live controversy involving the proposed class; if so, whether Mr. Shepard is a proper class representative; if not, whether an appropriate class representative wishes to be appointed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shepard v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 2, 1981
638 F.2d 909 (5th Cir. 1981)
Case details for

Shepard v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. SHEPARD, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BEAIRD-POULAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 2, 1981

Citations

638 F.2d 909 (5th Cir. 1981)

Citing Cases

White v. I.T.T

White contends that the dismissal was error because she adduced sufficient facts to satisfy the prerequisites…

Simer v. Rios

Plaintiffs also cite to several cases which require procedural safeguards in disposing of class certification…