Shellenberger v. AIG WarrantyGuard, Inc.

Full title: HADASSAH SHELLENBERGER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court: United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 25, 2024

2:24-cv-00657-JLR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 25, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-00657-JLR

07-25-2024

HADASSAH SHELLENBERGER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AIG WARRANTYGUARD, INC., and WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Defendants.

By: Evan E. Sumer Evan E. sumer (Admitted Pro Hoc Vice) Law Office of Evan sumer Albert Law PLLC Gregory W. Albert, WSBA #42673 Tallman H. Trask, IV, WSBA #60280 Approved as to Form by: Donald J. Verfurth Donald J. Verfurth (WSBA # 15554) GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI Rachel E. K. Lowe (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ALSTON & BIRD David B. Carpenter (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ALSTON & BIRD One Atlantic Center Adam Kaiser (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ALSTON & BIRD Attorneys for Defendant AIG WARRANTYGUARD, INC. WHEELER TRIGG O'DONNELL LLP Galen D. Bellamy Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell LLP Galen D. Bellamy Attorneys for Defendant WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

THE HON. JAMES L. ROBART, JUDGE.

By: Evan E. Sumer

Evan E. sumer (Admitted Pro Hoc Vice)

Law Office of Evan sumer

Albert Law PLLC

Gregory W. Albert, WSBA #42673

Tallman H. Trask, IV, WSBA #60280

Approved as to Form by:

Donald J. Verfurth

Donald J. Verfurth (WSBA # 15554)

GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI

Rachel E. K. Lowe (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

ALSTON & BIRD

David B. Carpenter (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

ALSTON & BIRD

One Atlantic Center

Adam Kaiser (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

ALSTON & BIRD

Attorneys for Defendant

AIG WARRANTYGUARD, INC.

WHEELER TRIGG O'DONNELL LLP

Galen D. Bellamy

Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell LLP

Galen D. Bellamy

Attorneys for Defendant

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE WORD LIMIT FOR PLAINTIFF'S CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS

THE HON. JAMES L. ROBART, JUDGE.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having reviewed Parties' Joint Stipulation to Extend the Word Limit for Plaintiff's Consolidated Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, the Court finds that good cause exists to approve it. Plaintiff may file a single memorandum of points and authorities, not to exceed 10,800 words, in support of her oppositions to Defendants' separate motions to dismiss.

Defendants AIGWG and Whirlpool may each respond to Plaintiff's consolidated Opposition with a separate reply brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.