From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shapiro v. Gordon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 27, 1950
277 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

June 27, 1950.

Appeal from Supreme Court.

Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Bergan, JJ.


Appellant contends that the arbitrators were not impartial; that he had no opportunity to have his witnesses sworn; that no testimony was taken; that the court erred in assessing costs; that the award was not made within the time contemplated by the agreement; that it was not properly acknowledged; that there are many other reasons why the award should not have been confirmed. The Special Term properly decided that these contentions lacked merit. The court fixed the arbitrators' fees at $250. Apparently they only served one day each and therefore their fees must be limited to $25 per day or a total of $75. The order of the Special Term should be modified accordingly. Order, as so modified on the law, unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements to respondents.


Summaries of

Shapiro v. Gordon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 27, 1950
277 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Shapiro v. Gordon

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN SHAPIRO et al., Copartners Doing Business as S S CONSTRUCTION CO.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1950

Citations

277 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Marsh v. Loffler Housing Corp.

" Id. at 562, 501 A.2d 480. In support of its conclusion in Bernard, this Court cited In re Shapiro, 197…

In re Arbitration between Cia De Navigacion “Julia” S.A. & P. D. Marchessini & Co.

Wilko v. Swan, 1954, 346 U.S. 427, 74 S.Ct. 182, 98 L.Ed. 168; James Richardson Sons v. W.E. Hedger Transp.…