From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shannon v. Fidelity Nat'l BK

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 2, 1976
531 S.W.2d 958 (Ark. 1976)

Opinion

No. 75-226.

Opinion delivered February 2, 1976

COURTS — PERSONAL JURISDICTION — TRANSACTING BUSINESS WITHIN STATE. — Endorsement in Arkansas of guaranty of payment on the back of a note to an Arkansas bank by a resident of another state constituted transacting business within the state under the long-arm statute which confers personal jurisdiction over a non-resident as to a cause of action arising from his transacting any business within the state. [Ark. Stat. Ann. 27-2502 (Supp. 1975).]

Appeal from Crittenden Circuit Court, Gerald Pearson, Judge; affirmed.

Troutt, Moore Johnson and Spears Sloan, for appellant.

Skillman, Durrett Davis, for appellee.


This appeal presents a single question under our "long-arm statute. In 1972 R. S. Pitts executed a $15,000 promissory note to the plaintiff-appellee, Fidelity National Bank of West Memphis, Arkansas. The appellant Shannon, a resident of Tennessee, came to the bank and endorsed a guaranty of payment on the back of the note. Pitts defaulted and went bankrupt. Shannon, upon being sued in Arkansas, appeared specially and contended that he was not subject to personal jurisdiction here. This appeal is from a judgment rejecting that plea and holding Shannon liable upon his guaranty.

The judgment is correct. The long-arm statute confers personal jurisdiction over a nonresident as to a cause of action arising from his "transacting any business in this State." Ark. Stat. Ann. 27-2502 (Supp. 1975). In construing the statute in Wichman v. Hughes, 248 Ark. 121, 450 S.W.2d 294 (1970), we cited a number of cases holding that personal jurisdiction may be sustained on the basis of "a single contractual transaction." To that list may be added Pacer International Corp. v. Otter Distributing Co., 273 N.Y.S.2d 829, 51 Misc.2d 737 (1966), where, as here, the nonresident executed a guaranty within the state. Hence the statute, as we have construed it, confers personal jurisdiction over Shannon, because the bank's cause of action arises from Shannon's having transacted business in Arkansas.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Shannon v. Fidelity Nat'l BK

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 2, 1976
531 S.W.2d 958 (Ark. 1976)
Case details for

Shannon v. Fidelity Nat'l BK

Case Details

Full title:A.V. SHANNON v. FIDELITY NATIONAL BANK of West Memphis

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 2, 1976

Citations

531 S.W.2d 958 (Ark. 1976)
531 S.W.2d 958

Citing Cases

Eagle Material Handling of Arkansas, Inc. v. Acme Dock Specialists, Inc.

Even a single contractual obligation might bring a person within the statute under the proper circumstances.…

Dreyfus Co., Inc. v. Royster Co.

He was subject to suit here under the Arkansas Long-Arm Statute for "transacting business" in this state.);…