From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shanklin v. Tucker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Apr 23, 2012
Case No.: 3:11cv357/RV/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:11cv357/RV/MD

04-23-2012

TIMOTHY A. SHANKLIN, Petitioner, v. KENNETH S. TUCKER, Respondent.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 21, 2012. (Doc. 19). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. 18) is GRANTED.

3. The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), later amended (doc. 7), challenging the conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Shanklin in the Circuit Court of Okaloosa County, Florida, case numbers 06-CF-2720, 07-CF-974 and 07-CF-975 be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the clerk is directed to close the file.

4. Certificate of appealability is DENIED.

_________________

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Shanklin v. Tucker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Apr 23, 2012
Case No.: 3:11cv357/RV/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Shanklin v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY A. SHANKLIN, Petitioner, v. KENNETH S. TUCKER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 23, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 3:11cv357/RV/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

Whitfield v. Sec'y, DOC

See Shanklin v. Tucker, No. 3:11cv357/RV/MD, 2012 WL 1398186, at *3 (N.D. Fla. March 21, 2012) (not reported…

Rogers v. Sec'y

Id. Thus, the filing of such a motion does not toll the one-year limitations period for filing a federal…