Opinion
2014-11-18
In re ZION NAZAR H–S., a Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Shaniqua W., Respondent–Appellant, Jewish Child Care Association of New York, Petitioner–Respondent.
Carol Kahn, New York, for appellant. Law Offices of James M. Abramson, PLLC, New York (Dawn M. Orsatti of counsel), for respondent.
Carol Kahn, New York, for appellant. Law Offices of James M. Abramson, PLLC, New York (Dawn M. Orsatti of counsel), for respondent.
Larry S. Bachner, Jamaica, attorney for the child.
FRIEDMAN, J.P., ACOSTA, SAXE, MANZANET–DANIELS, GISCHE, JJ.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Sarah P. Cooper, J.), entered on or about December 18, 2013, which denied respondent mother's motion to vacate an order of fact finding and disposition, same court and Judge, entered on or about July 12, 2013, determining that she permanently neglected the subject child, terminating her parental rights, and committing the custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Respondent failed to provide either a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear at the fact finding and dispositional hearings, or a meritorious defense to the permanent neglect petition ( seeCPLR 5015[a]; Matter of Evan Matthew A. [Jocelyn Yvette A.], 91 A.D.3d 538, 938 N.Y.S.2d 6 [1st Dept.2012] ). Respondent's documentation did not demonstrate that her appointment with the New York City Department of Homeless Services was scheduled in advance or that it could not have been rescheduled so that it did not occur on the same day as the hearing on the petition to terminate her parental rights. In any event, it did not excuse her from notifying her attorney or the court, especially since she knew of the date of the fact-finding hearing two months earlier ( see Matter of Lisa Marie Ann L. [Melissa L.], 91 A.D.3d 524, 936 N.Y.S.2d 542 [1st Dept.2012] ). Further, the mother's partial compliance with requisite services is insufficient to establish a meritorious defense to the petition ( see Matter of Julian Michael G. [Jeannette G.], 94 A.D.3d 573, 942 N.Y.S.2d 346 [1st Dept.2012] ).
We have reviewed the mother's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.