From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shady Oaks Mobile v. Fla. P.S.C

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 22, 1995
654 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 93-3339.

May 22, 1995.

An appeal from an order of the Florida Public Service Commission.

Robert A. Antista and John L. Wharton of Rose, Sundstrom Bentley, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert D. Vandiver, General Counsel, and David E. Smith, Director of Appeals, Florida Public Service Com'n, Tallahassee, for appellee.


The final order of the Public Service Commission imposing a fine against the appellant utility company is affirmed. See Florida Real Estate Commission v. Webb, 367 So.2d 201 (Fla. 1978). Although Appellant argues that the final order fails to find specifically that Appellant knowingly refused to comply with, or willfully violated, a provision of chapter 367 or any lawful rule or order of the commission, that issue was never raised in the proceedings before the commission or in Appellant's motion for reconsideration of the final order and therefore cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, J., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Shady Oaks Mobile v. Fla. P.S.C

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 22, 1995
654 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Shady Oaks Mobile v. Fla. P.S.C

Case Details

Full title:SHADY OAKS MOBILE MODULAR ESTATES, INC., APPELLANT, v. FLORIDA PUBLIC…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 22, 1995

Citations

654 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Rosenzweig v. Transportation

Neither the Department nor appellants apprised the hearing officer of this issue. It is well established that…

Goodson v. Florida

Section 455.225(5) provides, in relevant part, "If any party raises an issue of disputed fact during an…