From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shade v. Bank of America

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 21, 2009
No. 2:08-cv-1069 LKK JFM PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2009)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-1069 LKK JFM PS.

December 21, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On October 30, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has filed amended objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 30, 2009, are adopted in full;

2. The September 14, 2009 motion to dismiss is granted, and

3. Defendants Raymond A. Patenaude and Patenaude Felix, APC, are dismissed from this action


Summaries of

Shade v. Bank of America

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 21, 2009
No. 2:08-cv-1069 LKK JFM PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2009)
Case details for

Shade v. Bank of America

Case Details

Full title:ROSS SHADE, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, FIA CARD SERVICES, N.A., et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 21, 2009

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-1069 LKK JFM PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2009)

Citing Cases

Willard v. Bank of Am.

May 2, 2012) ("Finally, to the extent plaintiff is attempting to assert a claim based upon the securitization…

Scott v. Bank of Am.

debtor and a creditor. See, e.g., Batchelor v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 12-14835, 2013 WL 1499583, at *3…