From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shackleford v. George Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1985
110 A.D.2d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

April 1, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.).


Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term properly exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs' motion for a joint trial. Involved are separate, unrelated accidents and separate trials will enable the juries to focus on the factual issues presented as to each accident (CPLR 602; Abbatepaolo v. Blumberg, 7 A.D.2d 847; Pride v. Perras, 6 A.D.2d 842; cf. Doll v. Castiglione, 86 A.D.2d 711). Mollen, P.J., Titone, Lazer and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shackleford v. George Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1985
110 A.D.2d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Shackleford v. George Mills

Case Details

Full title:HORACE SHACKLEFORD et al., Appellants, v. GEORGE MILLS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Nichols v. Spackenkill Union Free Sch. Dist

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Marasco, J.). Order affirmed, with costs (see, Shackleford v.…

Continental Building Co. v. Town of N. Salem

Further, action No. 1 is ready for trial, while disclosure in action No. 2 is in a preliminary phase. Since…