From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaad v. Hutchinson's Boat Works, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 26, 1972
40 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

October 26, 1972

Appeal from the Jefferson Special Term.

Present — Goldman, P.J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Moule and Henry, JJ.


Order unanimously modified by striking the words "on the merits" and as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this action by an attorney to recover for legal services, a question is raised as to when the cause of action accrued. The complaint, the schedule annexed to the complaint, and the affidavit in opposition to the motion to dismiss set forth different dates. An issue of fact is present which should be resolved at trial. ( Golia v. Health Ins. Plan of Greater N Y, 6 A.D.2d 884, affd. 7 N.Y.2d 931; 30-12 Lewmay Corp. v. Public Mut. Ins. Co., 28 A.D.2d 837; Liberman v. Zeigen, 258 App. Div. 893.)


Summaries of

Shaad v. Hutchinson's Boat Works, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 26, 1972
40 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Shaad v. Hutchinson's Boat Works, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT B. SHAAD, Respondent, v. HUTCHINSON'S BOAT WORKS, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1972

Citations

40 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Shaad v. Boat Works

The defendant contests the merits of the complaint. It also asserts a defense of the six-year Statute of…