From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sganga v. Grund

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 2003
1 A.D.3d 342 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Summary

In Sganga, Sarah Grund transferred by deed her sole title to the plaintiffs "subject to a retained life estate" in herself and her husband, Mr. Grund. 766 N.Y.S.2d at 585-86.

Summary of this case from In re Austin

Opinion

2002-09416

Argued September 16, 2003.

November 3, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant does not have a life estate in certain real property owned by the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated September 10, 2002, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Harvey A. Arnoff, Riverhead, N.Y. (Bridget Fleming of counsel), for appellants.

Mirkin Gordon, P.C., Great Neck, N.Y. (Arthur J. DiBerardino of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for entry of an appropriate judgment.

By deed dated November 15, 2001, Sarah Grund transferred title to certain real property to the plaintiffs "subject to a retained life estate" in herself and the defendant, Walter Grund. Mrs. Grund died on March 11, 2002. The defendant refused to vacate the premises after Mrs. Grund's death and the plaintiffs commenced this action seeking, inter alia, a declaration that the defendant does not have a life estate in the property.

The reservation of a life estate in the deed did not create a valid interest in favor of the defendant, who was a "stranger to the deed," even assuming that it was Mrs. Grund's intention to create such a life estate ( see Matter of Estate of Thomson v. Wade, 69 N.Y.2d 570, 573-574; Tuscarora Club of Millbrook v. Brown, 215 N.Y. 543; Beachside Bungalow Preserv. Assn. of Far Rockaway v. Oceanview Assoc., 301 A.D.2d 488; Lechtenstein v. P.E.F. Enters., 189 A.D.2d 858). Consequently, the Supreme Court should have granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.

ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, FRIEDMANN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sganga v. Grund

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 2003
1 A.D.3d 342 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

In Sganga, Sarah Grund transferred by deed her sole title to the plaintiffs "subject to a retained life estate" in herself and her husband, Mr. Grund. 766 N.Y.S.2d at 585-86.

Summary of this case from In re Austin
Case details for

Sganga v. Grund

Case Details

Full title:RONALD J. SGANGA, JR., ET AL., appellants, v. WALTER GRUND, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 3, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 342 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 585

Citing Cases

Peters v. Smolian

Additionally, in Cerniglia v. Church of Holy Name of Mary, 72 A.D.3d 862, 901 N.Y.S.2d 286 (2d Dept.2010),…

Peters v. Smolian

A "reservation" is "always of something issuing, or coming out of, the thing or property granted, and not a…