3:06CV00163 WRW/JFF.
March 4, 2008
After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 62) is DENIED.
Full title:ERNEST SEXTON, et al. PLAINTIFF v. WAYMOND HUTTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS…
Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Date published: Mar 4, 2008
Ms. Randle did not assert a failure to supervise claim in her complaint and has not requested leave from the…
Duhe v. City of Little Rock, Ark.Finally, there is no indication in plaintiffs' amended complaint that plaintiffs intend to bring a claim for…