From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sexton v. Essex County Ritualarium

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Sep 10, 1952
21 N.J. Super. 329 (App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

Argued September 8, 1952 —

Decided September 10, 1952.

Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR, and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Harry Green argued the cause for appellants ( Messrs. Hodes Hodes, attorneys; Mr. William Hodes).

Mr. Bernard Freedman argued the cause for respondents ( Messrs. Koehler, Augenblick Freedman, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ewart in Sexton v. Bates, 17 N.J. Super. 246 ( Law Div. 1951).


Summaries of

Sexton v. Essex County Ritualarium

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Sep 10, 1952
21 N.J. Super. 329 (App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Sexton v. Essex County Ritualarium

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC JOSEPH SEXTON, PHILIP BLUME, ISIDORE MILLER, JOSEPH MILLER, LOUIS…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Sep 10, 1952

Citations

21 N.J. Super. 329 (App. Div. 1952)
91 A.2d 162

Citing Cases

State v. Congdon

Religious activities have been limited by uniformly applied zoning ordinances. Allendale Congregation of…

State v. Cameron

Id. at 59-60. Finally, in Sexton v. Bates, 17 N.J. Super. 246 (Law Div. 1951), aff'd o.b. 21 N.J. Super. 329…