From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sexton v. Berryhill

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jul 18, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO 2:17cv179-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 18, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO 2:17cv179-MHT (WO)

07-18-2017

JOHN D. SEXTON, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice and with no costs taxed.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 18th day of July, 2017.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sexton v. Berryhill

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jul 18, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO 2:17cv179-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 18, 2017)
Case details for

Sexton v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:JOHN D. SEXTON, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 18, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO 2:17cv179-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 18, 2017)