From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sewell v. Liberty Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 25, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-01721 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 25, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-01721

04-25-2012

JACQUELINE M. SEWELL, individually and in her capacity as Executrix of the Esetate of GREGSON R. SEWELL, deceased, Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


ORDER

NOW, this 25th day of April, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (Doc. 16) is DENIED.

___________________________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sewell v. Liberty Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 25, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-01721 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Sewell v. Liberty Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JACQUELINE M. SEWELL, individually and in her capacity as Executrix of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 25, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-01721 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 25, 2012)

Citing Cases

Kirschner v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

A claim that the drafting of the policy language itself was in bad faith is not actionable under Pennsylvania…

Grudkowski v. Foremost Ins. Co.

At most, Grudkowski alleges that Foremost engaged in bad faith conduct by drafting a contradictory or…