From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Settle v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jul 23, 1925
238 P. 499 (Okla. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

No. A-4929.

Opinion Filed July 23, 1925.

Appeal from County Court, Kay County; J.L. Roberson, Judge.

Jeff Settle appeals from an order overruling a motion for the return of property taken under authority of a search warrant. Appeal dismissed.

Sargent Ross, for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General and G.B. Fulton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, for the reason that no final judgment was ever rendered in the cause.

The record shows that the defendant made a motion for the return of property seized by officers under authority of a search warrant, which motion was by the court denied. From the order overruling this motion, the defendant has attempted to appeal to this court.

This ruling or order is not a "judgment," within the meaning of section 2805, Comp. Stat. 1921, from which an appeal by the defendant lies. "Judgment" means final judgment, as distinguished from an intermediate or ancillary order made during the progress of the trial. McLellan v. State, 2 Okla. Cr. 633, 103 P. 876; Stanton v. State, 23 Okla. Cr. 193, 213 P. 914.

The motion of the Attorney General is sustained, and the appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Settle v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jul 23, 1925
238 P. 499 (Okla. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Settle v. State

Case Details

Full title:JEFF SETTLE v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 23, 1925

Citations

238 P. 499 (Okla. Crim. App. 1925)
238 P. 499

Citing Cases

Moran v. State

"Where the appeal is from an intermediate order only, before the rendition of final judgment in the action,…

Lamb v. State

This section has been construed to permit appeals only from the judgment itself rendered against a defendant,…