From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sessel v. Outlaw

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division
Jun 25, 2009
NO. 2:08cv00212 JMM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 25, 2009)

Summary

rejecting argument that a prisoner's participation in a "skills development program" required 12 months of RRC placement

Summary of this case from Conrad v. Outlaw

Opinion

NO. 2:08cv00212 JMM.

June 25, 2009


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition received from Magistrate Judge Jerry Cavaneau. There have been no objections. The Findings and Recommendations are adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings.

Accordingly, Respondent's motion (doc. 14) to dismiss this 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby granted, dismissing this action in its entirety with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sessel v. Outlaw

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division
Jun 25, 2009
NO. 2:08cv00212 JMM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 25, 2009)

rejecting argument that a prisoner's participation in a "skills development program" required 12 months of RRC placement

Summary of this case from Conrad v. Outlaw
Case details for

Sessel v. Outlaw

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH A. SESSEL PETITIONER REG. #07849-031 v. T.C. OUTLAW, Warden, FCI…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division

Date published: Jun 25, 2009

Citations

NO. 2:08cv00212 JMM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 25, 2009)

Citing Cases

Witkowski v. Kallis

See also, Olim v. Waukinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 245 (1983) (holding that a prisoner has no constitutional right…

United States v. Washington

The Second Chance Act leaves the decision about whether—and when—to place an inmate into a community…