From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sepulveda v. Reyes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 2005
19 A.D.3d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5866.

June 28, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice L. Bowman, J.), entered September 17, 2003, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Anthony J. Centone, White Plains, for appellants.

Sheldon H. Kronegold, New York, for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Marlow, Ellerin and Sweeny, JJ.


The evaluation by plaintiffs' treating physician, Dr. Etkind, was based on his own examination and objective medical evidence, including MRIs ( see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345), and concluded with the opinion that the injuries were both related to the accident and permanent. This raises issues of fact as to whether these plaintiffs sustained "serious injury" within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d). There is sufficient explanation in the record for the alleged gap of over three years between the discontinuance of plaintiffs' treatment and their examination by Dr. Etkind.


Summaries of

Sepulveda v. Reyes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 2005
19 A.D.3d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Sepulveda v. Reyes

Case Details

Full title:GUILLERMO SEPULVEDA et al., Respondents, v. ENRIQUE REYES et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 28, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
797 N.Y.S.2d 487

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Elrac, Inc.

These restrictions were objectively measured and quantified, and corroborated by positive straight leg…

Moreta v. Hamlin

Thus, even if the court considers this issue first raised in reply, McNair v. Lee, 24 AD3d at 160, on the…