From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sephes v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
May 6, 2020
294 So. 3d 949 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 4D19-1449

05-06-2020

Daniel Lamont SEPHES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Breanna Atwood, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Breanna Atwood, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

Warner, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Warner, J., concurring specially.

Appellant challenges his conviction of felon in actual possession of a firearm and his sentence to thirty years in prison. He raises three issues, all of which are not meritorious. However, I would have affirmed based upon law of the case, as he failed to file a cross appeal in the prior state appeal of the trial court's order entering a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. See Generazio v. State , 727 So. 2d 333, 335 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

State v. Sephes , 262 So. 3d 811, 814 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).


Summaries of

Sephes v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
May 6, 2020
294 So. 3d 949 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Sephes v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL LAMONT SEPHES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: May 6, 2020

Citations

294 So. 3d 949 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)