From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
May 28, 1930
41 F.2d 57 (7th Cir. 1930)

Opinion

No. 4347.

May 28, 1930.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

Action by Edwin C. Dinwiddie against the Sentinel Company. From an order granting a new trial on plaintiff's motion to set aside verdict as inadequate, defendant appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

Charles B. Quarles, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellant.

Aaron B. Rosenthal, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellee.

Before EVANS, PAGE, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.


Appellee brought this action to recover damages occasioned by appellant's publication of an alleged libel. The verdict of the jury in appellee's favor was, on his motion, set aside as inadequate and a new trial granted. This appeal is from the order granting the new trial.

Appellee moves this court to dismiss the appeal because the order is not an appealable one. Upon the authority of Dry Dock E.B. B.R. Co. v. Petkunas (C.C.A.) 261 F. 988; Wright v. Taft-Peirce Mfg. Co. (C.C.A.) 287 F. 131; and Fort Dodge Portland Cement Corp. v. Monk (C.C.A.) 276 F. 113, the motion must be granted.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
May 28, 1930
41 F.2d 57 (7th Cir. 1930)
Case details for

Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie

Case Details

Full title:SENTINEL CO. v. DINWIDDIE

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: May 28, 1930

Citations

41 F.2d 57 (7th Cir. 1930)

Citing Cases

United Retail C. § T. Ass'n v. Denahan

With certain exceptions not here material, the Act creating this court limits appeals to it from final orders…

Long v. Davis

The appeal was taken on July 9, 1948. Appellees moved to dismiss it on the ground that the order was not a…