From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Semler v. Ultem Publications, Inc.

City Court of New York, Trial Term, Queens County
Nov 9, 1938
170 Misc. 551 (N.Y. City Ct. 1938)

Opinion

November 9, 1938.

Cass, Bacal Castaldi, for the plaintiff.

Louis H. Solomon, for the defendants.


The plaintiff is a professional model and brings this action to recover for the use of her photograph in negligee appearing on a page of the publication of the defendants called Silk Stocking Stories. It would appear from all the evidence that it was the pictures of partly draped women appearing in this magazine that sold the magazine as well as the stories. It would further appear that the magazine was intended to and did make an appeal to sex. On each page of the publication there appears a picture. Certainly these pictures would be considered as use for the purposes of trade.

The defendant contended that the photographer who took the picture in question had obtained the consent of the plaintiff. The plaintiff, however, was an infant and could not give her consent. The consent of the parents or guardian was not obtained. The story on the same page where plaintiff's picture was used was rather risque. I find that the plaintiff has established the burden of proof and that the use of her photograph was unauthorized. I find a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $500, and direct that judgment be entered accordingly.


Summaries of

Semler v. Ultem Publications, Inc.

City Court of New York, Trial Term, Queens County
Nov 9, 1938
170 Misc. 551 (N.Y. City Ct. 1938)
Case details for

Semler v. Ultem Publications, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARIAN SEMLER, an Infant, etc., Plaintiff, v. ULTEM PUBLICATIONS, INC.…

Court:City Court of New York, Trial Term, Queens County

Date published: Nov 9, 1938

Citations

170 Misc. 551 (N.Y. City Ct. 1938)
9 N.Y.S.2d 319

Citing Cases

Lomax v. New Broadcasting Co.

Authority on the subject is not completely satisfactory. In the first place, it is well to eliminate such…

Branson v. Fawcett Publications

Cases suggesting a broad extension of waiver by public figures include Cohen v. Marx, 94 Cal.App.2d 704, 211…