From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sellers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 10, 1982
421 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 82-254.

November 10, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Sarasota County, Stephen L. Dakan, J.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and William H. Pasch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced to sixty years in prison with the trial judge retaining jurisdiction over the first one-third of appellant's sentence.

The sole issue before us is whether section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981) is unconstitutional. The statute provides for the entry of an order retaining jurisdiction over the offender for certain enumerated crimes and requires the trial judge to state the justification with individual particularity for retaining jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of the trial judge is limited to the first third of the sentence imposed.

Appellant's contention that the statute is unconstitutional has been previously addressed and rejected by the Florida Supreme Court in Borden v. State, 402 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 1981). See also Arnett v. State, 397 So.2d 330 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 408 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 1981). Accordingly, we affirm appellant's conviction and sentence.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.


Summaries of

Sellers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 10, 1982
421 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Sellers v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH SELLERS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 10, 1982

Citations

421 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Springfield v. State

Appellant's contention that the statute is facially unconstitutional has been previously addressed and…