From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sellers v. Culbertson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 15, 1969
224 So. 2d 808 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Opinion

No. 69-106.

July 15, 1969.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, James W. Kehoe, J.

Snowden Willis and Walter E. Mackoul, Miami, for appellant.

Thomas C. Britton, County Atty., and Joseph D. Komansky, Asst. County Atty., for appellees.

Before PEARSON, C.J., HENDRY, J., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.


Ralph J. Sellers, Jr., appeals from a declaratory judgment which ruled that he was barred from asserting a claim for back salary after his reinstatement as an employee of Dade County. He was reinstated after the county conceded the unconstitutionality of Section 2-51, Code of Metropolitan Dade County, because of the holding in Gardner v. Broderick, 392 U.S. 273, 88 S.Ct. 1913, 20 L.Ed.2d 1082 (1968).

The ruling concerning laches constitutes a finding of fact based upon the evidence. See City of Miami v. Carter, Fla. 1958, 105 So.2d 5; Metropolitan Dade County Pl. C.E.B. v. State ex rel. Bishop, Fla.App. 1968, 216 So.2d 76. The record before us is insufficient to show error, and the judgment is affirmed upon authority of Renshaw v. State ex rel. Hickland, 149 Fla. 342, 5 So.2d 700 (1942).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Sellers v. Culbertson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 15, 1969
224 So. 2d 808 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
Case details for

Sellers v. Culbertson

Case Details

Full title:RALPH J. SELLERS, JR., APPELLANT, v. W.W. CULBERTSON, TAX ASSESSOR, AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 15, 1969

Citations

224 So. 2d 808 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Camacho

Several courts have found forfeiture of office statutes similar to § 40-98 to be unconstitutional under…

Englander v. State

Section 2-51 of the Code, like Section 2-55, supra, were not applicable to petitioner in any event, although…