From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seiferth v. Hay

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Mar 31, 1967
225 N.E.2d 350 (Mass. 1967)

Summary

In Seiferth v. Hay, 225 N.E.2d 350, 351 (Mass. 1967), the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts affirmed the probate court's denial of proposed jury issues stating that "there must be a genuine and doubtful question of fact supported by evidence of such substantial nature as to afford reasonable expectation of a result favorable to the moving party."

Summary of this case from Petition of Atkins

Opinion

March 31, 1967.

Max L. Glazer for the contestants.

Jules E. Angoff for the proponent.


This is an appeal from a denial by the Probate Court of a motion to frame jury issues on a petition for the allowance of a will. In addition to oral statements made to the judge written offers of proof were presented. The judge made a report of material facts. He found "that there was no genuine or doubtful question of fact" affording a "reasonable hope" for a result favorable to the contestants. "The principles of law applicable to the subject of jury issues are so familiar that they need not be set forth at length. Briefly stated, there must be a genuine and doubtful question of fact supported by evidence of such substantial nature as to afford reasonable expectation of a result favorable to the moving party. . . . The scope of an appeal in such cases is similar to an appeal in equity with a report of the evidence. It is our duty to examine the statements of expected evidence and to decide the case in accordance with our own judgment, giving due weight to the decision of the judge." Abbott v. Noel, 337 Mass. 133, 138. We see no reason for reaching a different conclusion than that of the judge.

Order denying motion for jury issues affirmed.


Summaries of

Seiferth v. Hay

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Mar 31, 1967
225 N.E.2d 350 (Mass. 1967)

In Seiferth v. Hay, 225 N.E.2d 350, 351 (Mass. 1967), the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts affirmed the probate court's denial of proposed jury issues stating that "there must be a genuine and doubtful question of fact supported by evidence of such substantial nature as to afford reasonable expectation of a result favorable to the moving party."

Summary of this case from Petition of Atkins
Case details for

Seiferth v. Hay

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SEIFERTH vs. RAEBURN HAY others

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Mar 31, 1967

Citations

225 N.E.2d 350 (Mass. 1967)
225 N.E.2d 350

Citing Cases

Petition of Atkins

The Massachusetts probate courts, pursuant to a Massachusetts statute similar to RSA chapter 567-A, have…

Cushman v. Nichols

Cf. Bruno v. Bruno, 10 Mass. App. Ct. 918 (1980), S.C., 384 Mass. 31, 33-35 (1981). Even apart from the…