Seidman v. Booth Memorial Medical Center

Full title: HADASSAH SEIDMAN, as Mother and Natural Guardian of EVE SEIDMAN, an…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1994

202 A.D.2d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

610 N.Y.S.2d 805

Opinion

March 14, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Contrary to the appellants' contentions, we find that their respective motion and cross motion for summary judgment were properly denied. The expert's affidavit submitted by the plaintiffs in opposition to the motion and cross motion was sufficient to raise triable issues of fact (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324; Akerman v. City of New York, 198 A.D.2d 391). Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.