From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seidel v. Maynard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 14, 1951
279 App. Div. 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

November 14, 1951.

Present — Taylor, P.J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Wheeler, JJ.


Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the jury's finding as to negligence and contributory negligence is against the weight of evidence. Memorandum: While the question of damages is not before us on this appeal, we call attention to the fact that any moneys received by plaintiff as disability compensation or sick-leave benefits under a Federal Sick-Leave Regulation cannot be regarded as wages or used in diminution of damages arising by reason of loss of time. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for defendant for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action.)


Summaries of

Seidel v. Maynard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 14, 1951
279 App. Div. 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Seidel v. Maynard

Case Details

Full title:HANNAH SEIDEL, Appellant, v. DANIEL H. MAYNARD, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 14, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Szybura v. City of Elmira

The general rule is that damages cannot be mitigated or reduced because of payments received by the injured…

Siemes v. Englehart

The money so paid is analogous to sums paid under a policy of accident insurance, and as in such instances,…