From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Segui v. O'Rourke

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 3, 1964
328 F.2d 965 (9th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 18835.

March 3, 1964.

Fitzsimmons Petris, Edward R. Fitzsimmons, and Ruth S. Harwitz, Oakland, Cal., for appellants.

Schwab Kant, and Oliver Schwab, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellees.

Before BARNES, HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.


The record discloses no responsive pleading had been filed when this action was dismissed. Rule 15(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is applicable. Cf. Breier v. Northern California Bowling Proprietors Ass'n, 9 Cir. 1963, 316 F.2d 787.

The judgment of dismissal is reversed, and the action remanded with leave to plaintiffs to amend, if they so desire.


Summaries of

Segui v. O'Rourke

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 3, 1964
328 F.2d 965 (9th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

Segui v. O'Rourke

Case Details

Full title:Maria Teresa Cruz SEGUI, as next friend on behalf of Digna Luz Ortiz, an…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 3, 1964

Citations

328 F.2d 965 (9th Cir. 1964)

Citing Cases

Galloway v. Forum Publishing Company

A motion to dismiss is not a responsive pleading within the provisions of this rule. Keene Lumber Co. v.…