Segarra v. State

Full title: ERIC SEGARRA, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 2, 1988

530 So. 2d 492 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-1912.

September 2, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Thomas E. Penick, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Brad Permar, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

The defendant challenges the revocation of his probation, claiming that there was insufficient evidence to establish a violation. We find his arguments unpersuasive. The written order of revocation fails, however, to indicate the grounds of Segarra's probation violation although at the sentencing hearing the trial court made such a statement. Therefore, we affirm the revocation of the defendant's probation but remand for the trial court to enter a proper written order corresponding with its oral pronouncement. Brown v. State, 429 So.2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.