From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seemer v. Seemer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1997
240 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 9, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court properly found that she had failed to make a prima facie showing of her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The brief account of the accident set forth in the plaintiff's affidavit was insufficient to demonstrate that she acted reasonably under the circumstances, and was free from comparative negligence (see, Barletta v. Lewis, 237 A.D.2d 238; Davis v. Federated Dept. Stores, 227 A.D.2d 514; Jong Chan Lee v. Bonavita, 216 A.D.2d 8; Rodriguez v. Logan, 188 A.D.2d 522). Moreover, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, which was made only one month after joinder of issue and before pretrial discovery had even begun, was premature (see, Barletta v Lewis, supra; Rodriguez v. Logan, supra).

Pizzuto, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Seemer v. Seemer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1997
240 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Seemer v. Seemer

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE SEEMER, Appellant, v. JOHN R. SEEMER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 781

Citing Cases

Zani v. Nordstrom, Inc.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. Summary judgment was properly denied as there are issues of…