From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seely v. Hertz Corporation

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 20, 1970
231 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

No. 69-293.

February 20, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Claude R. Edwards, Judge.

Council Wooten, Jr., of Billings Frederick, Orlando, for appellant.

R.G. Ross, of Pitts, Eubanks Ross, Orlando, for appellees.


We have examined the record and the appellate presentation and find that the presumption of correctness which accompanies orders allowing a new trial has not been overcome. No abuse of discretion having been demonstrated, the order granting a new trial is hereby affirmed. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 669; City of Fort Pierce v. Cooper, Fla.App. 1966, 190 So.2d 12; and Volk v. Goetz, Fla.App. 1967, 206 So.2d 250; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 317.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, REED, and OWEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Seely v. Hertz Corporation

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 20, 1970
231 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

Seely v. Hertz Corporation

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES SEELY, APPELLANT, v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION, A DELAWARE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 20, 1970

Citations

231 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)