From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seda v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 1956
2 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

June 12, 1956


Judgment appealed from is perforce based on a finding that the infant plaintiff fell while jumping for the horizontal bar. The evidence in this case however impels us to find that he fell not while jumping for the bar but while he was in the act of swinging on it. In these circumstances no liability may be imposed upon the defendant ( Miller v. Board of Educ., 249 App. Div. 738). Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the defendant dismissing the complaint herein. Settle order on notice.

Concur — Botein, J.P., Rabin, Cox, Frank and Valente, JJ.


Summaries of

Seda v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 1956
2 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Seda v. Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SEDA, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, ANGEL SEDA, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 12, 1956

Citations

2 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Citing Cases

Ruiz v. Westbrooke Lake Homes, Inc.

As such we do not dispose of the issue on such grounds. Another Florida case is that of Iannacone v. City of…

Iannacone v. City of N. Miami Beach

Affirmed. See Hillman v. Greater Miami Hebrew Academy, Fla. 1954, 72 So.2d 668; Miller v. Board of Education…