From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Security Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Sup’rs of Los Angelescounty

Supreme Court of California
Aug 31, 1893
4 Cal. Unrep. 222 (Cal. 1893)

Opinion

          In bank, Appeal from superior court, Los Angeles county; William P. Wade, Judge.

         Petitions by the Security Savings Bank & Trust Company, Main Street Savings Bank & Trust Company, and Los Angeles Savings Bank for a writ to review an order of the board of supervisors of Los Angeles county, sitting as a board of equalization, directing property to be added to the assessments of petitioners. From a judgment annulling the order the board appeals. Reversed.           COUNSEL

          [4 Cal.Unrep. 223] James McLachlan, Waldo M. York, and B. M. Marble, for appellant.

          Graves, O’Melveny & Shankland, for respondents.


          OPINION

          PER CURIAM.

         In Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank v. Board of Equalization, 97 Cal. 318, 32 P. 312, most of the questions [4 Cal.Unrep. 224] involved in this appeal were determined adversely to the respondent. The additional point now presented, that the legislature could not confer upon the state board of equalization authority to extend the time within which the county board of equalization could act, must also, under the principles declared in that case, be determined against the respondent; and, upon the authority of that case, the judgment is reversed.


Summaries of

Security Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Sup’rs of Los Angelescounty

Supreme Court of California
Aug 31, 1893
4 Cal. Unrep. 222 (Cal. 1893)
Case details for

Security Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Sup’rs of Los Angelescounty

Case Details

Full title:SECURITY SAV. BANK&TRUST CO. v. BOARD OF SUP’RS OF LOS ANGELESCOUNTY et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Aug 31, 1893

Citations

4 Cal. Unrep. 222 (Cal. 1893)
4 Cal. Unrep. 222

Citing Cases

Rancho Santa Margarita v. County of San Diego

The notice on its face showed that the members of the board entertained an opinion on the approximate amount…

Tobin v. Omnibus Cable Co.

Under the instructions given at defendant’s request, the verdict must have hinged solely upon the questions…