From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. Am. Ice Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 1944
268 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

November 20, 1944.


Action to enforce contribution under section 211-a of the Civil Practice Act, on the theory that the predecessors in interest of plaintiff and defendant were joint tort-feasors and equally responsible for a wrong which resulted in judgments that plaintiff, as insurer, ultimately paid. Plaintiff sues under its right of subrogation. Order denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. The record of the trial of the prior actions — Gernhardt v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., Inc. ( 259 App. Div. 735, affd. 284 N.Y. 765), and McCready v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., Inc. ( 259 App. Div. 737, affd. 284 N.Y. 765 — which resulted in the judgments on which this action is founded, shows that while the pleadings formally charged the ice company with the same acts of negligence as the laundry company, nevertheless the proof established, without contradiction, that the ice company in no way participated in the wrongful act which caused the accident. On the contrary, the proof showed that it was the laundry company which stored and maintained the gas without the required permit; that the gas was stored for the exclusive use of the laundry company; and that it was maintained on a part of the premises which was owned and occupied by the laundry company. The local city ordinance (now Administrative Code of the City of New York, § C19-95.0; L. 1937, ch. 929) imposes no duty upon any person other than the one who stored the gas. Under such circumstances, the laundry company is the primary, if not the sole, wrongdoer and hence, it cannot, through plaintiff, enforce contribution or indemnity from the ice company's successor. (Cf. Employers' Liability A. Corp. v. Post McCord, 286 N.Y. 254; Bonadonna v. City of Buffalo, 156 Misc. 225: Phoenix Bridge Co. v. Creem, 102 App. Div. 354, affd. 185 N.Y. 580; Dunn v. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co., 175 N.Y. 214; Scott v. Curtis, 195 N.Y. 424, 428; Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp., 290 N.Y. 145.) Close, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. Am. Ice Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 1944
268 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. Am. Ice Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SECURITY MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. AMERICAN ICE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 20, 1944

Citations

268 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Citing Cases

Oliver v. McPherson

Where the plaintiff is injured as a result of a two-car collision, a judgment against the two actively…

Liebman v. County of Westchester

In a joint defendant contribution context the former rule was that a judgment on liability and damages could…