From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Securities Exchange Comm. v. Neurotech Development

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 23, 2011
04-CV-4667 (TCP) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2011)

Opinion

04-CV-4667 (TCP).

March 23, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court is Magistrate Judge William D. Wall's Report and Recommendation (DE 67) which recommends that plaintiffs motion for remedies of disgorgement, prejudgment interest and civil penalties be granted as set forth below.

As to Bernard Artz: disgorgement of proceeds in the amount of $131,414.00; prejudgment interest of $32,017.42; plus any additional interest accrued to the date of entry of judgment; and a civil penalty in the amount of $10,000.

As to Lawrence Artz: disgorgement of proceeds in the amount of $57,129.73; prejudgment interest of $79,846.92, plus any additional interest accrued to the date of entry of judgment; and a civil penalty in the amount of $5,000.00.

The undersigned, having reviewed Magistrate Judge Wall's report, finds that the recommendations contained therein are appropriate. There having been no objections, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, plaintiffs motion is hereby GRANTED to the extent set forth herein.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Securities Exchange Comm. v. Neurotech Development

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 23, 2011
04-CV-4667 (TCP) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Securities Exchange Comm. v. Neurotech Development

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. NEUROTECH DEVELOPMENT…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Mar 23, 2011

Citations

04-CV-4667 (TCP) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2011)

Citing Cases

U.S. Sec. Exchange Commn. v. Verdiramo

"'After a plaintiff makes a showing of the amount properly to be disgorged, the burden then shifts to the…

U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm‘n v. Verdiramo

“ ‘After a plaintiff makes a showing of the amount properly to be disgorged, the burden then shifts to the…