From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sec. Serv. Fed. Credit Union v. First Amrican Title Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2012
CASE NO. CV10-04824 SJO (VBKX) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV10-04824 SJO (VBKX)

01-27-2012

SECURITY SERVICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff, v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, a California Corporation; RINDLESBACH FAMILY, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company, Defendants.

Ryan C. Squire, SBN 199473 Zi C. Lin, SBN 236989 GARRETT & TULLY, P.C. J Attorneys for Defendant First American Title Insurance Company


Ryan C. Squire, SBN 199473

Zi C. Lin, SBN 236989

GARRETT & TULLY, P.C. J

Attorneys for Defendant

First American Title Insurance Company

(Hon. S. James Otero)


JUDGMENT ON FIRST AMERICAN'S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Filed Concurrently with Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Request for Judicial Notice; Declarations in support of MSJ; Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law; Table of Exhibits]

Date: November 7, 2011

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Place: Courtroom 1

Action Filed: June 29, 2010

Trial Date: February 7, 2011

PROPOSED JUDGMENT

After consideration of the papers in support of and in opposition to defendant First American Title Insurance Company's motion for summary judgment or partial summary judgment, this court orders summary judgment in favor of defendant First American Title Insurance Company as follows:

1. Count 1 of the second amended complaint for "breach of contract" fails as a matter of law.

2. Count 2 of the second amended complaint for "declaratory relief" fails as a matter of law.

3. Count 3 of the second amended complaint for "breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing" fails as a matter of law.

4. Count 4 of the second amended complaint for "fraudulent concealment -suppression of fact" fails as a matter of law.

5. Count 5 of the second amended complaint for "intentional misrepresentation" fails as a matter of law.

6. Count 6 of the second amended complaint for "negligent misrepresentation" fails as a matter of law.

7. Count 7 of the second amended complaint for "fraudulent inducement" fails as a matter of law.

8. Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages fails as a matter of law.

9. Defendant First American Title Insurance Company is awarded its costs of suit incurred in defense of this action.

10. Judgment is entered in favor of defendant First American Title Insurance Company.

_____________________

HON. S. JAMES OTERO

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 4, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the e-mail addresses denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I have mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non-CM/ECF participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 4, 2011.

_____________________

Melissa M. Vasquez

Garrett & Tully, APC

225 So. Lake Avenue, Suite 1400

Pasadena, CA 91101

Telephone: (626) 577-9500

Facsimile: (626) 577-0813

Email: Mvasquez@garrett-tully.com

MANUAL NOTICE LIST

Mark L. Rindlesbach

Rindlesbach Family LLC

2489 East Haven Lane

Holladay, UT 84117


Summaries of

Sec. Serv. Fed. Credit Union v. First Amrican Title Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2012
CASE NO. CV10-04824 SJO (VBKX) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Sec. Serv. Fed. Credit Union v. First Amrican Title Co.

Case Details

Full title:SECURITY SERVICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff, v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 27, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. CV10-04824 SJO (VBKX) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2012)

Citing Cases

Grigg v. O'Brien

In other words, if " the alleged fraud occurred more than three years ago, Plaintiff bears the burden to show…

Century Surety Co. v. Gene Pira Inc.

It was, therefore, reasonable for Pira to interpret the Policy as covering the types of testing he conducted.…