From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Searcey v. Dean

Supreme Court of the United States
Mar 4, 2019
139 S. Ct. 1291 (2019)

Summary

finding deputies "conducted a conscience-shocking reckless investigation . . . that was used to box" the plaintiffs in to entering guilty pleas

Summary of this case from Matthews v. McNeil

Opinion

No. 18–648.

03-04-2019

Burdette SEARCEY, et al., petitioners, v. James L. DEAN, et al.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Searcey v. Dean

Supreme Court of the United States
Mar 4, 2019
139 S. Ct. 1291 (2019)

finding deputies "conducted a conscience-shocking reckless investigation . . . that was used to box" the plaintiffs in to entering guilty pleas

Summary of this case from Matthews v. McNeil
Case details for

Searcey v. Dean

Case Details

Full title:Burdette SEARCEY, et al., petitioners, v. James L. DEAN, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Mar 4, 2019

Citations

139 S. Ct. 1291 (2019)
203 L. Ed. 2d 414

Citing Cases

Wilansky v. Morton Cnty.

In other words, when there is no directly controlling authority, courts look to whether there is “a robust…

Wilansky v. Morton Cnty.

In other words, when there is no directly controlling authority, courts look to whether there is “a robust…