From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seal v. Seal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 21, 1978
396 A.2d 372 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1978)

Opinion

Argued December 4, 1978.

Decided December 21, 1978.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Civil Division No. 1978-125, Eppinger, J.

David R. Woodward, Chambersburg, for appellant.

No appearance entered nor brief submitted for appellee.

Before CERCONE, HESTER and HOFFMAN, JJ.


OPINION


Appellant is the plaintiff in a divorce action. She contends that she should be excused from the payment of all costs in the prosecution of the action by reason of her indigency. She supports herself and her two children with public assistance payments of $294 per month. The costs of filing and service of the complaint would be $23.75. The court below found that appellant had the ability to pay this sum, and therefore entered an order requiring her to pay filing fees and sheriff's costs, and excusing her from the payment of all other costs in prosecuting the action. We find no abuse of discretion. Moskol v. Moskol, 247 Pa. Super. 181, 371 A.2d 1387 (1977); Nicholson v. Nicholson, 247 Pa. Super. 172, 371 A.2d 1383 (1977).

Order affirmed.

HOFFMAN, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Moskol v. Moskol, 247 Pa. Super. 181, 371 A.2d 1387 (1977) and Nicholson v. Nicholson, 247 Pa. Super. 172, 371 A.2d 1383 (1977).


Summaries of

Seal v. Seal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 21, 1978
396 A.2d 372 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1978)
Case details for

Seal v. Seal

Case Details

Full title:Betty L. SEAL, Appellant, v. Roger B. SEAL

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 21, 1978

Citations

396 A.2d 372 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1978)
396 A.2d 372