From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Se. Pa. Transp. Auth. v. City of Phila.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 15, 2016
133 A.3d 292 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 524 EAL 2015.

03-15-2016

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Respondent v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations, Petitioners.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the General Assembly, when it gave Philadelphia general police powers as expansive as [those] of the General Assembly and specific authority to enact local anti-discrimination laws, intend to exempt SEPTA from compliance with those laws, when the consequence of compliance would not materially disrupt SEPTA's core transportation function and the consequence of non-compliance would leave hundreds of thousands of Philadelphia passengers and employees without a remedy against many forms of discrimination?

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

Se. Pa. Transp. Auth. v. City of Phila.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 15, 2016
133 A.3d 292 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Se. Pa. Transp. Auth. v. City of Phila.

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Respondent v. CITY OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Mar 15, 2016

Citations

133 A.3d 292 (Pa. 2016)

Citing Cases

Se. Pa. Transp. Auth. v. City of Phila.

Did the General Assembly, when it gave Philadelphia general police powers as expansive as [those] of the…

Se. Pa. Transp. Auth. v. City of Phila.

would not materially disrupt SEPTA's core transportation function and the consequence of non-compliance would…