Se. Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena

Full title: SOUTHEAST FISH AND SEAFOOD CO., etc., Appellant, v. Edsel CADENA, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

106 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 3D12–1246.

2013-02-20

SOUTHEAST FISH AND SEAFOOD CO., etc., Appellant, v. Edsel CADENA, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Abby Cynamon, Judge. Roniel Rodriguez, IV, Aventura, for appellant. Ritter Chusid Bivona & Cohen, LLP, and Shawn R. Horwick, Boca Raton, and Gregory Ritter, Coral Springs, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Abby Cynamon, Judge.
Roniel Rodriguez, IV, Aventura, for appellant. Ritter Chusid Bivona & Cohen, LLP, and Shawn R. Horwick, Boca Raton, and Gregory Ritter, Coral Springs, for appellee.
Before SUAREZ, CORTIÑAS and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., Pariz v. Colon, 77 So.3d 721, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that a trial court had in rem jurisdiction over property situated within the county); Griveas v. Amoco Oil Co., 854 So.2d 841, 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“Only the circuit court in the county where the real property is located has in rem jurisdiction.”).