rejecting the plaintiff's excessive force claim that she suffered psychological injuries when the officer-defendant pointed a gun at her face because the show of force under the circumstances of the drug raid was not objectively unreasonable
Summary of this case from Martin v. City of Alexandria Municipality Police DepartmentNo. 99-31046.
July 11, 2000.
Appeal from the E.D.La.
Affirmed.
rejecting the plaintiff's excessive force claim that she suffered psychological injuries when the officer-defendant pointed a gun at her face because the show of force under the circumstances of the drug raid was not objectively unreasonable
Summary of this case from Martin v. City of Alexandria Municipality Police Departmentaddressing damages for "increased emergency medical care" from bodily injuries
Summary of this case from Discover Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Blue Bell Creameries U.S., Inc.stating that plaintiff's argument that she was not required to seek leave to amend her complaint to add a non-diverse defendant under Rule 15 "would be persuasive except that 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e) specifically confers on the district court the responsibility to scrutinize attempted joinder of non-diverse parties in cases previously removed to federal court"
Summary of this case from Shargian v. Shargiandirecting administrative closure subject to continued enforcement of the All Writs Order
Summary of this case from Leake v. Wastemasters, Inc.Full title:Scottsdale v. Natl Shooting Sports
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Date published: Jul 11, 2000
On the other side, the Blue Bell Defendants do not present any analogous cases that have adopted their…
Pigott v. GintzHodge v. Laryisson, 226 F.3d 642, *3 (5th Cir. 2000) (unpublished). Therefore, the Fifth Circuit held…