Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Pinecrest LTD

Full title: SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. PINECREST LIMITED…

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 13, 1999

739 So. 2d 733 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-1018, 97-27298.

Opinion filed September 13, 1999.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Gisela Cardonne, Judge, L.T. No. 97-27298.

Wiederhold, Moses, Bulfin Rubin and Robert D. Moses, for appellant.

McGrane Nosich and Rhea P. Grossman, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final summary judgment as the trial court properly enforced the insurance policy in accordance with its plain language and entered judgment concerning the attorney's fee issue in favor of appellees. See Wilson v. Wasser, 562 So.2d 339 (Fla. 1990); Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Bouchoc, 514 So.2d 52 (Fla. 1987); Prudential Ins. Co. of Amer. v. Lamm, 218 So.2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 225 So.2d 529 (Fla. 1969).

Affirmed.